Viridis Research → Viridis OS
Scientific kernels, explicit contracts.
Each package states what it computes, what it assumes, and what its evidence establishes. Publication, proof, runnable code and production adoption are separate states.
Workspace registry 2026.09.08-preview.1: unsigned preview only. These new packages have not been approved for production adoption.
applicability and constraint framework
The Intelligence Bound
Assess the foundational information and thermodynamic constraint framework without inventing a mapping to field conditions.
Package intelligence-bound · 1.0.0-preview.1
public ci passed exact source
The conditional P0 statement and compiled transitive axiom allowlist passed the cited public CI. This implementation run inspected receipts; it did not rerun Lean.
conditional assessment implemented
Structured applicability, missing inputs and source references; numerical constraint result is null.
not recorded
No field mapping or validation supplied for this workflow.
local review preview
This package composition is available for local unsigned scenario evaluation. Production release has not been authorized.
Relationship to the Intelligence Bound
root: This exact formal framework is the architectural root; every decision records its applicability. A formal statement is not itself a field calibration.
Statement, assumptions and executable contract
İ(τ) ≤ min(ρ(τ) B, P / (k_B T ln 2))
- μ is a probability measure; Ω and State are measurable spaces.
- observationBandwidth μ O ≠ ⊤.
- predictiveRichness μ X O τ ≤ 1; it is not established from ecosystem descriptions.
- 0 < kB and 0 < T, with nonnegative P and τ.
- SatisfiesLandauerLimit μ X O τ P T kB, defined as P ≥ intelligenceCreationRate μ X O τ × ofReal(kB × T × ln 2). This physical applicability is assumed, not derived from microphysics in P0.
- Justify actual X/O/μ/τ, physical regime, observation-channel quantities and mapping from available measurements; missing for generic conservation choices.
| Input | Units | Required | Supported values |
|---|---|---|---|
| mapping | categorical | Yes | unknown | not_applicable | proposed |
| explanation | text | Yes | Basis required for proposed mapping or exclusion; absent measurements remain missing |
Implementation SHA-256 af3f345b36e7efb9c072c1d490d49f5b499fbbda05004fca72affb033f554968
What the proof covers—and what remains outside it
The conditional P0 statement and compiled transitive axiom allowlist passed the cited public CI. This implementation run inspected receipts; it did not rerun Lean.
Toolchain: leanprover/lean4:v4.24.0; Mathlib f897ebcf72cd16f89ab4577d0c826cd14afaafc7
intelligence_bound
For every public P0 declaration, Lean.collectAxioms recursively gathers dependency axioms and rejects anything outside the allowlist; CI requires audit PASSED and no compiler sorry warnings.
- Ecological intelligence or a site score
- Numerical satisfaction of this constraint in the current workflow
- Field truth, conservation optimality or AI alignment
Sources and licenses
- Exact repaired P0 formal source · Apache-2.0
- Intelligence Bound Canon v10.2.0 archive · CC-BY-4.0
- Transitive P0 axiom audit · Apache-2.0
- Exact-source P0 public CI · Public build receipt
- Implementation and release boundary · Proprietary application documentation
scenario resource allocation
Thermodynamic retrofit water-filling
Compare divisible conservation intervention scenarios within an explicitly declared one-budget USD objective.
Package thermodynamic-economic-allocation · 1.0.0-preview.1
six algebraic targets certified
Published exact-hash Comparator Lean and Nanoda receipt covers six listed algebraic claims.
existing reference algorithm reused
Existing application bisection algorithm separated for shared use; package binds exact implementation bytes. Runtime checks and local cross-language comparisons are distinct from proof.
user supplied unvalidated
The model does not measure ecological effects or independently establish USD values.
local review preview
This package composition is available for local unsigned scenario evaluation. Production release has not been authorized.
Relationship to the Intelligence Bound
constraint compatibility: Generic real-algebra allocation proof does not import P0. Zenodo isDerivedFrom metadata indicates source attribution, not mathematical derivation. USD and physical burden are declared inputs. Root assessment is an orchestration dependency, not a theorem import.
Statement, assumptions and executable contract
Maximize Σ[(Gᵢ − Eᵢ)yᵢ − ½ηᵢyᵢ²] subject to 0 ≤ yᵢ ≤ 1 and Σcᵢyᵢ ≤ B. Reference allocation: yᵢ = clip((Gᵢ − Eᵢ − λcᵢ)/ηᵢ, 0, 1).
- One explicitly declared time period and common USD convention
- Each intervention is divisible; an indivisible land acquisition is outside this model
- Fixed supplied coefficients and positive capital/friction terms
- Independent additive interventions: no overlapping hectares, exclusivity or unmodeled network effects
- Quadratic transition friction is an explicitly accepted model
- Declared USD objective is justified separately; it is not an ecological effect estimate
| Input | Units | Required | Supported values |
|---|---|---|---|
| budget_usd | USD | Yes | finite, ≥0; workspace upper limit 1e12 |
| assets | named array of declared coefficients | Yes | 1–25 in reference; two in conservation workspace |
| capital_cost_usd, transition_friction_usd | USD | Yes | >0; workspace minimum 0.01 |
| gross_avoided_value_usd, embodied_transition_cost_usd | USD | Yes | finite, ≥0 |
| declared_evidence_ready, declared_price_authorized | boolean | Yes | false in this unsigned scenario workspace; no real allocation authority |
Implementation SHA-256 3f81dd0d78bfde887da87c5a48fd58d7d927269e8aaf214e2edf7e8efdaade37
What the proof covers—and what remains outside it
Published exact-hash Comparator Lean and Nanoda receipt covers six listed algebraic claims.
Toolchain: leanprover/lean4:v4.28.0; Mathlib 8f9d9cff6bd728b17a24e163c9402775d9e6a365
clippedAllocation_nonnegativeclippedAllocation_le_oneinterior_stationaritycoordinate_improvement_identityembodied_burden_lowers_benefitretrofit_allocation_nonvacuous
Read published dual Lean/Nanoda target-verification receipt; no independent rebuild of transitive Mathlib closure this turn. Proof covers six named targets, not Python/TypeScript correctness.
- thermodynamic integral
- full finite-dimensional KKT existence/uniqueness
- floating-point bisection implementation correctness
- ecological or monetary coefficient validity
- real-world decision authority
- field outcomes
- general replacement optimality
Sources and licenses
- The Thermodynamic Retrofit Water-Filling Note · CC-BY-4.0
- Run-139 six algebraic claims · Apache-2.0 repository; archive CC-BY-4.0
- Published Comparator certificate · CC-BY-4.0
- Published numerical verification · CC-BY-4.0
- Implementation and release boundary · Proprietary application documentation
- Exact repaired P0 formal source · Apache-2.0
Existing individual reference kernels
The existing workbench remains available. These individual computations have their own scope and maturity; they are not automatically admitted into the new composed workspace.
| Kernel and role | Source | Current interface state |
|---|---|---|
| Mutualist — natural-capital risk-premium pricing Deterministic theorem-backed computation; empirical input validity is external. | Published record | blocked product warrant required |
| Restoration — nucleation planting design (Θ go/no-go + n*) Deterministic theorem-backed computation; empirical input validity is external. | Published record | ready unsigned preview |
| Afforestation — cubic optimal-seeding law + site-prep lever Deterministic theorem-backed computation; empirical input validity is external. | Published record | ready unsigned preview |
| Harmonization — thermodynamic shadow-price coordination Deterministic theorem-backed computation; empirical input validity is external. | Published record | ready unsigned preview |
| Carbon Continuity — wildfire recovery threshold diagnostic Deterministic theorem-backed computation; empirical input validity is external. | Published record | ready unsigned preview |
| Tempo — stewardship cadence Deterministic theorem-backed computation; empirical input validity is external. | Published record | preview only canon record reconciliation required |
| Shared-channel coverage audit Whitened quadratic dissipation model with a fixed orthogonal-projector channel; not empirical task calibration. | Published record | preview only canon classification reconciliation required |
| Forbidden-proxy information capacity audit Finite-variable mutual-information ceiling; leakage budget and measured information remain externally justified inputs. | Published record | preview only canon classification reconciliation required |
| Moment-robust precautionary capacity certificate One-period two-moment marginal certificate; support, dependence, and estimation uncertainty require separate treatment. | Published record | preview only canon classification reconciliation required |
| Bilateral-benefit reciprocity corridor Two-party one-period linear payoff screen with known positive coefficients and a normative symmetric Nash rule. | Published record | preview only canon classification reconciliation required |
| Anytime monitoring change certificate Single frozen Bernoulli likelihood-ratio process; iid null and fixed model are load-bearing. | Published record | preview only canon classification reconciliation required |
| Seed-source bottleneck certificate Continuous one-period frozen binary-eligibility network; no field establishment, legality, procurement, or cost claim. | Published record | preview only canon classification reconciliation required |
| Directional switching hysteresis certificate Two-state scalar-evidence myopic model with fixed directional penalties and retain-on-tie choice. | Published record | preview only canon classification reconciliation required |
| Inverse-square shadow-price and capacity planner Positive supplied coefficients only; shadow cost, budget tolerance, and P*D/C capacity are model outputs, not field costs or ecological calibration. | Published record | ready unsigned preview |
| Multi-ring alignment capacity audit Finite supplied factors in [0,1]; the result audits multiplicative alignment loss and does not validate ring definitions or measurements. | Published record | ready unsigned preview |
| Symbiotic reciprocity and surplus audit Two-partner supplied-flow screen; mutualistic/parasitic labels apply only inside the declared model and do not establish consent, benefit sharing, or ecological causality. | Published record | ready unsigned preview |
| Decision-information capacity audit Predictive-richness data ceiling; the thermodynamic minimum is applied only when the caller explicitly declares maintenance or erasure work subject to the Landauer premise. | Published record | ready unsigned preview |
| Ecological-thermodynamic capital allocation Run-139 one-period, divisible-retrofit, fixed-coefficient, quadratic-friction, single-budget scenario. All burden values, prices, costs, and authority flags are user-supplied and remain empirically unvalidated. | Published record | ready unsigned preview |
Located research awaiting a supported package
These sources were inspected at the pinned Canon revision. Their presence does not make them interchangeable with existing implementations or ready for this workflow.
Formal P1 D-Score defines I(X;Y)/H(X). The application’s weighted ecological score is a different construction; no demonstrated calibration makes it a proxy for the Intelligence Bound.
D-Score · kernel candidate
Formal P1 shares Shannon entropy and mutual-information definitions. The application weighted ecological index is a different computation; no proven equality or empirical calibration maps it to I(X;Y)/H(X) or the IB budget.
Public Canon catalog reports external_validation:not-recorded. Runtime disposition: backlog no wrapper.
Stewardship Setpoint · kernel candidate
Adds logistic renewable-stock dynamics and H<=Omega*D as model premises. Source treats D as disequilibrium stock; this is not derived from corrected erasure-side Intelligence Bound.
Public Canon catalog reports external_validation:not-recorded. Runtime disposition: backlog no wrapper.
Universal Waterfilling · kernel candidate
Concave budget allocation is compatible with a separately declared resource constraint; generic real algebra does not derive from P0.
Public Canon catalog reports external_validation:not-recorded. Runtime disposition: backlog no wrapper.
Harmonic Early Warning · not eligible
Stipulated positive power-law models and floor-plus-slack detector cost. No universal ecological warning rule or first-principles detector floor derived.
Public Canon catalog reports external_validation:not-recorded. Runtime disposition: backlog canon admission required.
Wu Wei Dominance · not eligible
Finite abundance support/extinction threshold proof. Mapping intervention rate into subcritical/supercritical hypotheses explicitly not formalized.
Public Canon catalog reports external_validation:not-recorded. Runtime disposition: backlog canon admission required.
Wu Wei Sampling · not eligible
Brownian first-passage sampling and thermodynamic cost analogy. No empirical conservation sampling guarantee or direct P0 derivation.
Public Canon catalog reports external_validation:not-recorded. Runtime disposition: backlog canon admission required.
Wu Wei Inference · not eligible
AR(1), Gaussian information model and declared capacity throttle. No universal real-world optimal inference policy.
Public Canon catalog reports external_validation:not-recorded. Runtime disposition: backlog canon admission required.
Wu Wei Corridor · not eligible
Assumed contraction and feasible sets give fixed-point/convergence properties, not demonstrated ecological corridor feasibility.
Public Canon catalog reports external_validation:not-recorded. Runtime disposition: backlog canon admission required.
Wu Wei Crypticity · not eligible
Predictive/nonpredictive information and thermodynamic cost premises; no D-Score/field ecosystem derivation established.
Public Canon catalog reports external_validation:not-recorded. Runtime disposition: backlog canon admission required.
Reviewed conditional analyses
Three models you can attach to a decision
Each runs only after checking the original decision and selected pathways. Missing model inputs stay missing; a score cannot bypass a hard constraint.
Weight sensitivity · 0.1.0-dev.2
Audit whether a supplied fixed pairwise score ordering survives an explicit total-variation limit on stakeholder reweighting.
The Intelligence Bound remains the decision architecture root. These dimensionless scorecard inputs have no justified mapping to its required physical quantities. No Intelligence Bound numerical test or pass is claimed; the enclosing decision run must preserve its separately pinned root assessment.
- empirical
- Not field validated. Results remain conditional on supplied quantities and modeling premises.
- formal
- Exact retained theorem and certificate artifacts inspected; no fresh proof run and no proof of this executable.
- implementation
- Independent source-to-code review and Python/JavaScript tests passed for this exact adapter version.
- release
- Reviewed for an unsigned conditional preview. Deployment and intervention authority remain separate.
- Ecological benefit, causality, site feasibility, or a best conservation intervention.
- A necessary criterion: failure to certify strict order does not prove that a rank reversal is possible.
- A tight constrained optimum: the symmetric margin interval is an envelope.
- Empirical calibration, statistical uncertainty propagation, or protection against omitted or renormalized components.
- Intelligence Bound satisfaction, scientific admission, or production runtime correctness.
Staged commitment · 0.1.0-development.2
Inspect staged versus immediate commitment under the exact two-state model.
SOR is an elementary expected-value identity with separate modeling premises. It is not derived from the Intelligence Bound and establishes no information-maintenance mapping or quantitative compliance.
- empirical
- Not field validated. Results remain conditional on supplied quantities and modeling premises.
- formal
- Exact retained theorem and certificate artifacts inspected; no fresh proof run and no proof of this executable.
- implementation
- Independent source-to-code review and Python/JavaScript tests passed for this exact adapter version.
- release
- Reviewed for an unsigned conditional preview. Deployment and intervention authority remain separate.
- A larger declared expected value is not ecological optimality or an intervention instruction.
- No information quality, probability, benefit, harm or checkpoint cost is inferred.
- Hard-constraint declarations are separate from the payoff comparison.
- Synthetic values and accepted premises do not establish ecological validity.
Price convention comparison · 1.0.0-development.2
Exact one-period scalar ledger comparison for one or two projects; neither an ecological ranking nor investment authorization.
The dual-price identities have separate scalar bookkeeping premises. No mathematical derivation from the Intelligence Bound or quantitative compliance is established.
- empirical
- Not field validated. Results remain conditional on supplied quantities and modeling premises.
- formal
- Exact retained theorem and certificate artifacts inspected; no fresh proof run and no proof of this executable.
- implementation
- Independent source-to-code review and Python/JavaScript tests passed for this exact adapter version.
- release
- Reviewed for an unsigned conditional preview. Deployment and intervention authority remain separate.
- No ecological benefit, price authorization or best intervention is inferred.
- One common period and the same quantities and costs under both conventions are required.
- Only one or two projects with the same price pair are supported.
- A nonnegative ledger is not physical feasibility or investment approval.
Scientific review record
Open findings and held sources
Later review can identify limits in an already published paper. A certificate for named formal statements does not validate every paper claim. These findings remain visible and block new kernel qualification.
BCAN · Run-142 · qualification held
The necessary route-length implication following Proposition 2 does not follow from the stated lower bound on directional progress.
Coincident unit directions and one unit segment give projected displacement 1. A declared alignment floor of 1/2 satisfies the assumptions, but the claimed necessary length 1 / (1/2) = 2 exceeds the actual length 1.
The positive-length aggregation inequality itself is not refuted by this example. The retained Lean certificate covers narrower scalar statements; it does not prove this paper implication.
A corrected statement, corresponding numerical control and later independent scientific review are required before new kernel qualification. The published record remains unchanged.
Inspect the published sourceIndependent review SHA-256: 80cb55ebb079b79b795fae1faa4d4e297228bca097a94dcde93e57555793d89a
RAAC · Run-134 · qualification held
The current claim map labels general optimization and alignment claims as formally verified, while the cited Lean targets establish narrower algebraic identities.
A one-dimensional completing-square identity and two-dimensional polynomial factorizations do not by themselves establish the claimed general multidimensional optimization results.
This finding concerns proof coverage in the claim map. It does not refute the narrower algebraic statements or imply that every analytical paper result is false.
A corrected claim-to-proof map and later independent review are required before new kernel qualification. Original papers and proof artifacts remain unchanged.
Inspect the published sourceIndependent review SHA-256: a0038bfa09df4fdf50a45ee69f5466d0f1a755e7a85c3d3a7edd7d314dc94401