Published example — not your site
Carbon Continuity example report
Two separate examples: a hypothetical method run and a fictional diagnostic package. Neither is a customer result or a field measurement.
Run the method
Decision
Under the declared retention and regrowth coefficients, does the carbon-continuity model meet its continuity threshold?
This does not decide whether to harvest, enroll in a carbon program or conserve a real parcel.
Inputs · hypothetical
| Input | Published hypothetical value | Meaning and units |
|---|---|---|
| a | 0.6 | Retention coefficient — share of carbon retained after the fire (0–1). · dimensionless retention coefficient |
| d | 0.8 | Disturbance intensity coefficient (0–1). · dimensionless retention coefficient |
| r | 0.5 | Regrowth rate coefficient (0–1). · dimensionless coupling coefficient |
| p | 0.2 | Regenerative coupling — how strongly surviving stock supports regrowth (0–1). · dimensionless coupling coefficient |
Source: the pinned Carbon Continuity published example included in this receipt.
Result · model only
CONTINUITY_CAPABLE_WITHIN_MODEL
| Receipt output | Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| a | 0.6 | dimensionless retention coefficient |
| d | 0.8 | dimensionless retention coefficient |
| r | 0.5 | dimensionless coupling coefficient |
| p | 0.2 | dimensionless coupling coefficient |
| loop gain | 0.1 | dimensionless |
| leakage product | 0.08 | dimensionless |
| continuity number | 1.25 | dimensionless |
| threshold met | true | boolean model result |
| regime | CONTINUITY_CAPABLE_WITHIN_MODEL | categorical model result |
| witness living | 0.5 | As declared in the receipt |
| witness durable | 0.4 | As declared in the receipt |
| witness next living | 0.5 | As declared in the receipt |
| witness next durable | 0.42 | As declared in the receipt |
| witness nondecreasing | true | As declared in the receipt |
| market use | decision_support_only | As declared in the receipt |
| formal claim type | supplied_coefficient_threshold_evaluation | As declared in the receipt |
| market claim status | MODEL_OUTPUT_ONLY | As declared in the receipt |
| empirically calibrated | false | As declared in the receipt |
| underwriting advice | false | As declared in the receipt |
| credit quantity tco2e | Not computed | not computed |
| claim boundary | Model-scoped decision support only. Supplied coefficients require separate empirical justification; this output is not a carbon credit, project rating, insurance price, underwriting decision, or causal field claim. | As declared in the receipt |
Carbon continuity · above the model's threshold, modelled carbon can recover after disturbance (continuity-capable); below it, the stock depletes · Modelled from your declared coefficients, not measured carbon.
Intelligence Bound: INSUFFICIENT_INFORMATION · Evidence status: NOT_VALIDATED
Empirical status: NOT_VALIDATED. Intelligence Bound: INSUFFICIENT_INFORMATION.
SHA-256: 9f46baed64ebe9d048aca6ca692e3a7f0c657fd69d455b00096873d9a0ae2cf9
Verify the displayed receiptWhat would change it?
Different retention or coupling coefficients can change the threshold result. Recompute with justified inputs and test sensitivity; this single hypothetical example does not establish robustness.
Evidence still needed
A declared living and durable-pool boundary; independent coefficient calibration; disturbance history; uncertainty ranges; an observation plan; and the authority and consent needed for the intended decision.
What a paid diagnostic delivers
REFERENCE_ONLY — REFERENCE_ONLY: This is a clearly-labelled synthetic reference project with fictional identifiers; it is not a real engagement. [CC-MEMO-001]
This fictional diagnostic package is a separate run from the published method example above.
Sample — hypothetical boundary, not a customer result
Data-readiness letter
Data readiness: PASS · VRS-CC-READINESS-2
Readiness checks completeness of supplied evidence. It does not establish ecological validity or authorize action.
- BLOCKING
- 0
- MATERIAL
- 0
- ENHANCING
- 0
Source: READINESS_REPORT.json
Regime by coefficient case
The low and base cases fall in the depleting regime, while the high case falls in the continuity-capable regime within the model. [CC-MEMO-020]
For the named field-review decision, the model does not choose a coefficient case; empirical evidence must determine which supplied coefficients are defensible. [CC-MEMO-021]
Retain all three supplied cases until source review and field evidence justify narrowing the coefficient range. [CC-MEMO-022]
Source: 06_DECISION_MEMO.md. The model does not select the empirical case.
Diagnostic package receipt
Package status: PREPARED_NOT_DELIVERED · VRS-CC-DIAGNOSTIC-RECEIPT-2
Receipt file SHA-256: abfefb1322ae1623954eb78d3ddcbfba1e2bbc5b379db4fd58fb717ac6627270
Source file hashes
READINESS_REPORT.json: c05d20b794b0527e12f04c753d509a26b8aa96d6c1bf4ed60163eeb3fd58790c
06_DECISION_MEMO.md: 5e7a4350710aa80d06fda2ba6f55b4b5ab27d8dc82fc9d06113b3dd217b65eab
07_VIRIDISOS_RECEIPT.json: abfefb1322ae1623954eb78d3ddcbfba1e2bbc5b379db4fd58fb717ac6627270
PACKAGE_MANIFEST.json: 26619066753c308874b4644f9d67fe96ac00e30c628d632c431faecd756ca477
Recompute the kit receipt
python3 verify_receipt.py --directory . --result CLEAN_ROOM_RESULT.jsonRun inside the copied receipt directory containing the kit recompute files; these four displayed artifacts are not the complete recompute package.
Command source: ViridisOS/delivery_kit/carbon_continuity/README.md
Request a reviewed analysis
The scope and fee are agreed before work begins. View published Carbon Continuity pricing.