Viridis Research · Foundational constraint framework
The Intelligence Bound
The architectural root of Viridis OS. Every conservation decision records whether this framework applies, what is missing, and whether its quantitative constraints were actually evaluated.
The formal constraint
İ(τ) ≤ min(ρ(τ) B, P / (k_B T ln 2))
Conditional upper constraint on the specified predictive-information creation rate. The thermodynamic branch assumes a Landauer predicate for maintenance/erasure, not a universal information-acquisition floor.
Exact P0 mutualInformation is klDiv with no division by ln 2. Pinned Mathlib klDiv integrates llr, which uses the natural logarithm. Original P0 paper explicitly declares bits and bits/s. The same formal predicate still inserts kB*T*ln2. A physical bit-based evaluation needs an explicit reviewed conversion or reconciled source; do not silently repair the theorem in product code.
The current workspace returns a conditional, insufficient-information or not-applicable assessment. It does not claim that a conservation choice satisfies this bound.
public ci passed exact source
The conditional P0 statement and compiled transitive axiom allowlist passed the cited public CI. This implementation run inspected receipts; it did not rerun Lean.
conditional assessment implemented
Structured applicability, missing inputs and source references; numerical constraint result is null.
not recorded
No field mapping or validation supplied for this workflow.
local review preview
This package composition is available for local unsigned scenario evaluation. Production release has not been authorized.
Definitions and units
These quantities come from the formal artifact. Habitat quality, acreage, spending and ecological scores are not substitutes for them.
| Quantity | Definition | Units and scope |
|---|---|---|
| μ | Probability measure on the source sample space | not a scalar physical measurement |
| X, O | Environmental and observation processes Ω → NNReal → State | model-specific state spaces |
| τ | Prediction horizon | chosen time unit, seconds in original paper τ ≥ 0 in Lean; original paper describes τ > 0 |
| İ(τ) | limsup as t→∞ of I(X[0,t+τ]; O[0,t]) / t | natural-log information per time in exact Lean; bits/s claimed in original paper; correspondence review required |
| B | limsup as t→∞ of H(O[0,t]) / t | same information/time convention as İ finite |
| ρ(τ) | limsup as t→∞ of cumulative predictive information / observation entropy | dimensionless 0 ≤ ρ ≤ 1, upper bound supplied as hypothesis |
| P | Power in the assumed maintenance/erasure regime | watts (J/s) in physical reading nonnegative |
| T | Temperature in the assumed regime | kelvin strictly positive |
| k_B | Boltzmann constant in physical reading; positive NNReal parameter in formal statement | J/K in physical reading strictly positive; not inferred from habitat descriptors |
Assumptions remain explicit
- formal hypothesis: μ is a probability measure; Ω and State are measurable spaces.
- formal hypothesis: observationBandwidth μ O ≠ ⊤.
- formal hypothesis: predictiveRichness μ X O τ ≤ 1; it is not established from ecosystem descriptions.
- formal hypothesis: 0 < kB and 0 < T, with nonnegative P and τ.
- scientific regime hypothesis: SatisfiesLandauerLimit μ X O τ P T kB, defined as P ≥ intelligenceCreationRate μ X O τ × ofReal(kB × T × ln 2). This physical applicability is assumed, not derived from microphysics in P0.
- empirical/modeling dependency: Justify actual X/O/μ/τ, physical regime, observation-channel quantities and mapping from available measurements; missing for generic conservation choices.
- scientific regime hypothesis when using the dissipation bridge: landauer_dissipation_bound additionally assumes an erasure rate at least the creation rate and a Landauer erasure floor. Bounded memory alone is not that bridge.
Standard foundational axioms (propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound) are distinct from the scientific assumptions. The formal proof does not establish that the probability model or Landauer regime describes a particular ecosystem.
Exact statement and formal definitions
The statement below is quoted from the pinned public source, not reconstructed from product language.
theorem intelligence_bound {Ω State : Type} [MeasurableSpace Ω]
[MeasurableSpace State] (μ : Measure Ω) [IsProbabilityMeasure μ]
(X : Process Ω State) (O : Process Ω State) (τ : NNReal)
(P T kB : NNReal) (h_kB_pos : 0 < kB) (h_T_pos : 0 < T)
(h_landauer : SatisfiesLandauerLimit μ X O τ P T kB)
(hB : observationBandwidth μ O ≠ ⊤)
(hRho_le_one : predictiveRichness μ X O τ ≤ 1) :
intelligenceCreationRate μ X O τ ≤
min (predictiveRichness μ X O τ * observationBandwidth μ O)
(ENNReal.ofReal ((P : ℝ) / ((kB : ℝ) * (T : ℝ) * Real.log 2))) := by
refine' le_min _ _
· apply_rules [data_bound_lemma_conditional]
exact ne_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt hRho_le_one ENNReal.one_lt_top)
· exact thermodynamic_bound_lemma μ X O τ P T kB h_kB_pos h_T_pos h_landauermutualInformation
def mutualInformation {Ω A B : Type*} [MeasurableSpace Ω] [MeasurableSpace A]
[MeasurableSpace B] (μ : Measure Ω) (X : Ω → A) (Y : Ω → B) : ENNReal :=
klDiv (μ.map (fun ω => (X ω, Y ω))) ((μ.map X).prod (μ.map Y))Source lines 86–88shannonEntropy
def shannonEntropy {Ω A : Type*} [MeasurableSpace Ω] [MeasurableSpace A]
(μ : Measure Ω) (X : Ω → A) : ENNReal :=
mutualInformation μ X XSource lines 91–93Process
def Process (Ω State : Type) : Type := Ω → NNReal → StateSource lines 98–98
trajectory
def trajectory {Ω State : Type} (X : Process Ω State) (t : NNReal) :
Ω → (Set.Icc (0 : NNReal) t → State) :=
fun ω => (fun (s : Set.Icc (0 : NNReal) t) => X ω s)Source lines 101–103cumulativePredictiveInformation
def cumulativePredictiveInformation {Ω State : Type} [MeasurableSpace Ω]
[MeasurableSpace State] (μ : Measure Ω) (X : Process Ω State)
(O : Process Ω State) (t τ : NNReal) : ENNReal :=
mutualInformation μ (trajectory X (t + τ)) (trajectory O t)Source lines 110–113intelligenceCreationRate
def intelligenceCreationRate {Ω State : Type} [MeasurableSpace Ω]
[MeasurableSpace State] (μ : Measure Ω) (X : Process Ω State)
(O : Process Ω State) (τ : NNReal) : ENNReal :=
Filter.limsup (fun t : NNReal =>
cumulativePredictiveInformation μ X O t τ / t) Filter.atTopSource lines 118–122observationEntropy
def observationEntropy {Ω State : Type} [MeasurableSpace Ω]
[MeasurableSpace State] (μ : Measure Ω) (O : Process Ω State)
(t : NNReal) : ENNReal :=
shannonEntropy μ (trajectory O t)Source lines 125–128observationBandwidth
def observationBandwidth {Ω State : Type} [MeasurableSpace Ω]
[MeasurableSpace State] (μ : Measure Ω) (O : Process Ω State) : ENNReal :=
Filter.limsup (fun t : NNReal => observationEntropy μ O t / t) Filter.atTopSource lines 131–133predictiveRichness
def predictiveRichness {Ω State : Type} [MeasurableSpace Ω]
[MeasurableSpace State] (μ : Measure Ω) (X : Process Ω State)
(O : Process Ω State) (τ : NNReal) : ENNReal :=
Filter.limsup (fun t : NNReal =>
cumulativePredictiveInformation μ X O t τ /
observationEntropy μ O t) Filter.atTopSource lines 136–141SatisfiesLandauerLimit
def SatisfiesLandauerLimit {Ω State : Type} [MeasurableSpace Ω]
[MeasurableSpace State] (μ : Measure Ω) (X : Process Ω State)
(O : Process Ω State) (τ : NNReal) (P T kB : NNReal) : Prop :=
(P : ENNReal) ≥ intelligenceCreationRate μ X O τ *
ENNReal.ofReal ((kB : ℝ) * (T : ℝ) * Real.log 2)Source lines 152–156Reproduction, provenance and limits
The inspected public P0 build uses leanprover/lean4:v4.24.0 and Mathlib f897ebcf72cd16f89ab4577d0c826cd14afaafc7. Its compiled dependency audit recursively checks the allowed foundational axioms. This website update inspected the source and public build receipts; it did not run a new Lean or Comparator verification.
Current Git P0 proof bodies were repaired July 27 after July 19 Zenodo spine publication. The theorem/public version DOI and current code commit are separate provenance fields; no claim of byte identity with the Zenodo archive is made.
- Exact repaired P0 formal source · Apache-2.0
SHA-256 3f192275ee326f0fb2cf2dca3b4d97146044b3b12fca28ff18e07914fb4d9130
- Intelligence Bound Canon v10.2.0 archive · CC-BY-4.0
- Transitive P0 axiom audit · Apache-2.0
SHA-256 1845ca3c6eb788ef0baf33226efdd769f9053d4e1ed8cac8d90e9b9f5915fdff
- Exact-source P0 public CI · Public build receipt
- Implementation and release boundary · Proprietary application documentation
Physical constraints alone do not select human values, conservation objectives or an aligned intervention policy. Those choices stay explicit in the decision workspace.