Business
Compare ecological investments
Which project or investment fits our ecological goals and budget? Compare declared costs, constraints and the evidence behind each option.
Compare investments →The ecological OS for business, industry & conservation
Make ecological and economic decisions with evidence.
See your options, what they cost, and who or what they affect. Keep missing evidence visible. Leave with a decision record your team can inspect and discuss.
Free fit check · price agreed before paid work · unknown inputs welcome
What you take away
Example structureA clearer choice.
A record of why.
Should we protect habitat, restore a corridor, or combine both?
- Compare the options
- Costs, ecological effects, and doing nothing.
- See who bears the consequences
- People, places, and effects beyond the project boundary.
- Know what still needs an answer
- Missing evidence, limits, and accountable review.
Prefer to talk it through? Ask the Viridis Guide
Viridis Guide
Tell me the decision you have to make.
Routes to a theorem-backed method · never invents a number
Nothing you type is stored unless you choose to share it. We count which kinds of questions we can't answer yet.
Use public or non-sensitive information only. The Guide routes and explains; the kernels compute; a person reviews before anything is delivered. How it’s built · Run kernels yourself
Your decision, made inspectable
One question. An inspectable decision map.
A structural example with no field measurements. Open the workspace to supply conditions, compare alternatives and export the record.
Defines
Checks applicability and records the foundational constraint
Composes through an explicit contract; no automatic derivation
Compares supported conditions
Formal dependenciesEmpirical/model assumptionsUser informationHypothetical valuesUnknownsAlternatives
Start with the work you need to do
Three contexts. One ecological decision workflow.
Choose a starting question, then adapt it to your project. A fit check identifies supported analysis and evidence gaps before you commit to paid work.
Industry
Evaluate operating choices
How should we allocate resources while respecting ecological constraints? Frame alternatives, resource limits and evidence needed for a supported comparison.
Evaluate operations →Conservation
Prioritize protection and restoration
Which actions fit our conservation objectives and available funding? Compare protection, restoration and mixed management under stated assumptions.
Prioritize conservation →These are starting questions, not prevalidated sector models. Method fit and project evidence determine which conclusions Viridis can support.
Choose how to work with Viridis
Work with your team or connect an agent.
For decision teams
Get a reviewed analysis for your decision.
Bring your options, ecological goals, budget and evidence. We agree the scope, fee and delivery date, then prepare a comparison with human review and a report your team can use.
Free fit check · individually quoted analysis
For agents
Build a structured decision report.
Connect your agent, check that a method fits, and approve the exact quote. Receive up to three scenarios through one supported method, with inputs, limits and computation receipts attached.
Free previews · 1 USDC per automated report
Automated reports are unreviewed. Human review is available as a separately quoted service.
The practical product
Understand the choices, the assumptions, and what would change the decision.
A shared decision frame
Bring the question, ecological objectives, economic constraints and alternatives together. Inspect how the evidence connects to the choice.
Ecological and economic tradeoffs
Compare protection, restoration and mixed management against declared budgets. Add ecological impacts, affected communities and proposed limits in a linked account; keep missing evidence unknown.
A portable decision record
Save a scenario on your device or export a readable report and JSON. Inputs, assumptions, source references and kernel versions stay attached.
Today’s workflow supports conditional budget pathways, a linked ecological impact account and an optional resource allocation model. Attach reviewed analyses for weight sensitivity, staged commitment and price conventions, each with its own explicit premises. It does not infer habitat benefits, species responses or an optimal site intervention.
Explore the research behind the OS
From research to your decision
Research → Ecological OS → decisions
01
Viridis Research
Develops and publishes the scientific framework. Established knowledge, modeling assumptions and formal artifacts feed candidate research; acceptance requires review.
Explore the open science →02
Viridis Ecological OS
Integrates approved, versioned decision kernels. It checks applicability, composes constraints and preserves explanations for inspection.
Inspect the platform →03
Ecological decision service
Viridis Conservation brings that research into an ecological OS for business, industry and conservation: scenario workflows, evidence review, reports and supported operation. A scoped engagement connects the research to your decision and its limits.
Request a reviewed analysis →Looking for land stewardship or community conservation? Visit VergeCommon , our separate destination for that work.
An actual architectural root
The Intelligence Bound sets the foundational constraint framework.
Every decision records its root-kernel assessment. Quantitative constraints apply only when the theorem’s quantities, units and scientific mapping are justified. Other kernels connect through explicit contracts; they do not all follow from this theorem alone.
Read the statement, assumptions and current limits →Formal verification and field validation are different.
Lean establishes that a formal conclusion follows from stated hypotheses. Implementation checks assess code and computation. Neither proves field truth, ecological validity, or the correctness of a human objective.
The current root assessment is conditional. A source-unit correspondence review and a justified project mapping are required before a numerical Intelligence Bound result can be claimed.
Open science. Usable decision systems.
The mathematics is public. The product makes it useful.
Papers, formal artifacts and reference software are published through GitHub and Zenodo according to each artifact’s license. The nightly engine proposes scientific connections and candidate kernels from established knowledge. It is not a field sensor network, and candidate output cannot silently change production.
Customers pay for integrated workflows, scenario management, transparent reports, hosted operation, deployment, maintenance, support and domain-specific packaging. The commercial application and customer systems retain their existing product and licensing boundaries.
Project quotes show the scope, fee, payment milestones and acceptance criteria before work. Accepted quotes keep their agreed price; changes require a new review. Existing specialist offers remain available.
The long-term mission
Better decisions for the conditions that sustain life.
Viridis aims to support biospheric resilience, ecological regeneration and life-supporting processes amid change. Biospheric homeostasis describes that long-term mission; it does not mean keeping ecosystems static or claiming that planetary management has been solved.
AI alignment is a related research motivation. Physical constraints do not select human values or conservation objectives. Decisions remain with accountable decision-makers.
Viridis does not issue environmental credits, guarantee conservation outcomes, or authorize autonomous ecological intervention. A Verified Decision Chain preserves the evidence and limits for human review.
Ready when you are
Bring the decision you actually have to make.
Two minutes to a suggested method and the evidence it needs. Free, no account. Your draft stays in this tab; a fit check does not submit a service request.